CASE STUDY
INFLOW
& INFILTRATION REDUCTION PROJECT
Village of Hastings
The Village of Hastings is located in the
County of Northumberland north of Cobourg via Highway 45. The Village
is located along the Trent River, which flows directly through the
Village in a south-west to north-east direction. The Villages
population is approximately 1,000 persons.
The existing sanitary sewer system in the
Village of Hastings consists of 8.9 kilometres of gravity sanitary
sewer, ranging in size from 200 mm (8 inches) to 600 mm (24 inches)
in diameter, and 0.6 kilometres of sanitary force main, ranging in
size from 100 mm (4 inches) to 200 mm (8 inches) in diameter. There
are three sewage pumping stations in the system located on Homewood
Avenue, on Front Street at Bridge Street, and at the Water Pollution
Control Plant (WPCP) off Cedar Drive. The firm pumping capacity of
the three pumping stations ranges from 7.6 L/s to 38 L/s. Collected
sewage is pumped to the Villages Water Pollution Control Plant which
has a design capacity of 1,060 m3/d. The plant is a single train
oxidation ditch process with secondary clarification, effluent
disinfection via chlorination, and aerobic sludge holding.
In 1990, the Council of the Village of
Hastings authorized a sewer system needs study for the Village. The
purpose of the study was to determine the present condition and
performance of the sanitary sewer system. At that time, the capacity
of the Village’s sewage treatment plant was being exceeded on a
regular basis and a development freeze was in effect.
Staff reviewed water and sewage flow
records in the Village for the period 1987 to 1990. This review
indicated that the water flow was generally higher than the sewage
flow during the summer months, an indication that a considerable
amount of water, such as flushing hydrants and watering lawns and
gardens, etc., is not being returned to the sanitary sewer system.
However, in the fall and early spring average monthly sewage flows
exceeded water usage and in some cases actually exceeded the plant
design capacity. A comparison of monthly average sewage and water
flows for the years 1987 to 1990 are presented in Figures 2 through
5.
Staff also reviewed historical records for
raw sewage quality between 1987 and 1989. These data indicated that
the average BOD5 concentration in the raw sewage ranged from 38 to 78
mg/L, which is significantly less than the normally expected level of
200 mg/l for municipal sanitary sewage. Both the high monthly average
sewage flows during the fall and spring periods and low BOD5
concentrations indicated significant infiltration/inflow was reaching
the sanitary sewer system.
Given that significant infiltration/inflow
was suspected, an assessment and investigation program was conducted.
The assessment consisted of drainage area identification, sewer
inventory, sewer hydraulic capacity evaluation and a system operation
and maintenance review. The inspection program consisted of manhole
inspections, house-to-house survey’s, flow monitoring, smoke testing
and a television camera inspection of both the mainlines and
simultaneously in the lateral services.
Portable flow monitors were installed in
five locations during the flow monitoring program. The results of the
flow monitoring program allowed staff to isolate those areas of the
sewer system with the highest extraneous flows (ie. greatest
infiltration/inflow). The results of the flow monitoring were used to
streamline the sewage collection system inspection.
As a result of the sewage collection system
inspection, a considerable number of manholes were found to have
deficiencies related to general inflow and infiltration. In addition,
sump pumps were identified as being connected to the sanitary sewer
system during the house-to-house survey, smoke emissions were
identified through smoke testing and several sewer sections were
found to be in need of repair as determined through in depth,
isolated, television inspections.
A staged approach to sewer rehabilitation
was proposed as a result of the investigations. Staff prepared
specifications for the rehabilitation works in 1993. The sewer
rehabilitation contract was awarded to D.M. Robichaud Associates, a
sewer rehabilitation contractor specializing in trenchless
technology, in 1994. The work was completed in 1994, 1995, and
1996.
D.M. Robichaud used a number of
rehabilitation techniques on this project. The rehabilitation work
included chemical
sealing of manholes and sewer lines, structural spot
repairs, and extensive manhole
upgrades. Manholes in the system had benching replaced, precast joint/seams were
sealed, new ladder rungs were installed, inflow protector
bins were installed, and the chimney
section was sealed using CretexTM seals. All joints within the mainline sewer were pressure tested and
sealed, using a urethane chemical
grout. All lateral service mouth
connections were pressure tested and
sealed. Several areas of the sewer system required inline reaming to
remove root infestations, protruding lateral connections and calcium
deposits prior to chemical grouting. Sixty service lateral repairs
were completed. The work on the service laterals included: mini
camera inspections and plotting, back to back clean out installations, chemical
sealing and spot repairs, and full lateral
lining. The total construction cost of
the sewer rehabilitation program was approximately $420,000, sixteen
percent below the budget of $500,000.
The impact of the rehabilitation works on
influent flows to the water pollution control plant have been
dramatic. A comparison of average monthly water and sewage flows for
1996 and 1997 indicated a significant drop in wastewater flows. Plant
operations staff have reported a drop in influent wastewater flow of
over 50%. Staff has conservatively estimated the flow reduction as
30% or 300 m3/d (66,000 igal/d). The unit cost of the capacity gained
is therefore approximately $6.40/igal. The estimated cost to
construct a 300 m3/d (66,000 igal/d) expansion at the Hastings WPCP,
based upon a similar project being undertaken for the Village of
Fenelon Falls, is $800,000. The unit cost of plant expansion is
therefore approximately $12.12/igal almost twice the cost of the
capacity gained via sewer rehabilitation. The Village of Hastings is
once again open for business now that the development freeze has been
lifted. Significant residential and commercial growth is in the
planning stages.